Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: order participant list alphabetically #197

Open
rtfm98 opened this issue Sep 22, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Feature Request: order participant list alphabetically #197

rtfm98 opened this issue Sep 22, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rtfm98
Copy link

rtfm98 commented Sep 22, 2022

Hey there,

I'd like to propose another feature request. We use Calls for our daily team meetings - colleagues take their turn to speak in alphabetical order.
Therefore it would be helpful if at least the participants list in the sidebar would be statically sorted alphabetically (while being in fullscreen mode). The participant list in the center may remain dynamic, though.

Maybe, a way to sort the list arbitrarily via dropdown (alphabetically, active speaker first, joining time, ...) would also be helpful.

Best regards!

@streamer45
Copy link
Collaborator

@rtfm98 The participants list should already be sorted alphabetically with a couple of precedence rules:

  • Presenter (the participant screen sharing)
  • Participants unmuted
  • Participants with their hand raised

If this is not the case I suspect it may be a bug. Could you share a screenshot perhaps?

@rtfm98
Copy link
Author

rtfm98 commented Sep 23, 2022

Hi @streamer45 and thanks for your quick reply.
You're right that the list is sorted alphabetically by precedence rules (is it intended to sort by first name?). My point was about the precedence rules: to be able to use the list as "who's next" list, a static sorting without precedence rules would be helpful, so that even the active speaker doesn't jump directly to the top.

image

@streamer45 streamer45 added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 23, 2022
@streamer45
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for clarifying. We may want to consider a way to cycle between different sorting algorithms to cover the various use cases.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants