-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
creating BEM head models for M/EEG forward modeling MNE-style #4
Comments
+1 I have some code for simnibs to cluster, and some bash wrappers for visualization in freeview |
Separate advice for EEG and MEG? |
@sarathykousik we can compare and merge at the Hack. But as it is for the a multi-layer BEM there should be no difference between MEG & EEG. |
Code-wise yes. But pipeline-wise we should discuss it. But that's more a pipeline issue. 👍 |
BEM forward modelling in SPM is shared with Fieldtrip and done using Robert Oostenveld's "forward" toolbox. |
FieldTrip supports several BEM variants: OpenMEEG (contributed by my group), dipoli, and bemcp. For MEG, a fast and for many 'good enough' alternative is their "Single Shell" model (originally devised by Guido Nolte), which uses a brain or scalp segmentation as a 'shell'. BTW it seems bemcp isn't used much (possibly crashy?), but my group is also using dipoli and we will soon compare OpenMEEG to dipoli... |
+1 for singleshell option in FT. All you need from FS is a cortical surface and co-reg from somewhere. |
If the aim is both EEG & MEG we should have instructions on a three layer BEM as this is needed for EEG and combined EEG/MEG. @sarathykousik @sarangdalal Is it fairly straight forward to make a BEM in FT based on imported surfaces in FreeSurfer format? Simnibs (if given the right MRI data) creates good surfaces and from visual inspection they are a better fit than anything else I have seen so far. |
@MadsJensen: I haven't tried multi-layer BEM + FT on my data. Only tried out this tutorial. Once seg is done within FT (I think it uses some SPM functions), then you can use one of the variants Sarang mentioned. |
@MadsJensen , as long as your meshes are 'BEM-compatible' -- i.e., the surfaces cannot intersect themselves, and the different layers cannot touch -- then they should be pretty straightforward to import and use with FT. Even if not, perhaps the same mesh-fixing routines that we use for SPM/Fieldtrip-generated meshes would also work. |
Important note: The "dipoli" BEM variant in FieldTrip is for EEG only |
Documentation and best-practices for creating multi-layer BEMs for source localisation
@MadsJensen @sarathykousik
Perhaps a line or two on the wiki about how SPM does this? @martinjdietz
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: