You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be good to list a few other options for free reader apps besides just Adobe - Foxit, Apryse, Xodo, and Xpdf all support attachments. I would go so far as to say that the vast majority of standalone PDF viewers support attachments. It's mainly the browsers that are hamstrung.
under "Considerations of delivering attachments in PDF" I would also suggest a "Security" bullet stating that due to viewer security concerns, some types of embedded files (e.g. anything executable - exe, scripts, etc.) may not be extractable from PDFs even if embedded, so do not attempt distribute in this manner.
From @petervwyatt:
It would be good to list a few other options for free reader apps besides just Adobe - Foxit, Apryse, Xodo, and Xpdf all support attachments. I would go so far as to say that the vast majority of standalone PDF viewers support attachments. It's mainly the browsers that are hamstrung.
Firefox (pdf.js) DOES support attachments but you need to scroll the PDF page into view first for file attachment annotations (see this bug I raised: Not all file attachments are shown on initial opening, but appear later mozilla/pdf.js#17821 - the updated URL for the test PDF mentioned in this issue is now https://labs.pdfa.org/FragmentTest.pdf if you wish to confirm). But associated files with AFRelationship (i.e. those in the EmbeddedFiles name tree) will appear from the start.
under "Considerations of delivering attachments in PDF" I would also suggest a "Security" bullet stating that due to viewer security concerns, some types of embedded files (e.g. anything executable - exe, scripts, etc.) may not be extractable from PDFs even if embedded, so do not attempt distribute in this manner.
the Usage section is outdated (cf. https://www.metanorma.org/author/topics/sections/attachments/) - this was why I didn't previously note more recent changes support the description
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: