Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Other "explicit markup" construct (e.g. for Sphinx) support? #45

Open
sidequestboy opened this issue Oct 21, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Other "explicit markup" construct (e.g. for Sphinx) support? #45

sidequestboy opened this issue Oct 21, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@sidequestboy
Copy link

This plugin supports the main admonitions and things of the form:

.. something::

that are defined in docutils documentation, but could it also support others e.g. the ones defined by Sphinx here or plugins for Sphinx like the mathjax/pngmath plugin that uses the syntax:

.. math::

Supporting all of Sphinx's extensions may also get unwieldy pretty fast, especially with reserved keyword shortcuts for each. Perhaps this plugin can suggest an auto-completion when .. m (for example) has been typed. Also, if this method were used for all explicit markup constructs (like .. note::, .. danger::, etc.), there would be less conflict with the built-in word autocompletion provided by Sublime Text.

An example of the conflict I'm talking about:

If I want to write "admonition", and have typed it before, I could type:

admon<TAB>

but if I wanted the explicit markup construct, I could type:

.. ad<TAB>

Feel free to disagree with me; there are a lot of Sphinx extensions, it seems. (built-in extensions are listed and documented here)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant