Bump postcss and react-scripts in /Client

[dependabot]

Bumps postcss to 8.4.35 and updates ancestor dependency react-scripts. These dependencies need to be updated together.

Updates postcss from 6.0.23 to 8.4.35

Release notes

Sourced from postcss's releases.

8.4.35

• Avoid ! in node.parent.nodes type.
• Allow to pass undefined to node adding method to simplify types.

8.4.34

• Fixed AtRule#nodes type (by @​tim-we).
• Cleaned up code (by @​DrKiraDmitry).

8.4.33

• Fixed NoWorkResult behavior difference with normal mode (by @​romainmenke).
• Fixed NoWorkResult usage conditions (by @​ahmdammarr).

8.4.32

• Fixed postcss().process() types (by @​ferreira-tb).

8.4.31

• Fixed \r parsing to fix CVE-2023-44270.

8.4.30

• Improved source map performance (by @​romainmenke).

8.4.29

• Fixed Node#source.offset (by @​idoros).
• Fixed docs (by @​coliff).

8.4.28

• Fixed Root.source.end for better source map (by @​romainmenke).
• Fixed Result.root types when process() has no parser.

8.4.27

• Fixed Container clone methods types.

8.4.26

• Fixed clone methods types.

8.4.25

• Improve stringify performance (by @​romainmenke).
• Fixed docs (by @​vikaskaliramna07).

8.4.24

• Fixed Plugin types.

8.4.23

• Fixed warnings in TypeDoc.

8.4.22

• Fixed TypeScript support with node16 (by @​remcohaszing).

8.4.21

• Fixed Input#error types (by @​hudochenkov).

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from postcss's changelog.

8.4.35

• Avoid ! in node.parent.nodes type.
• Allow to pass undefined to node adding method to simplify types.

8.4.34

• Fixed AtRule#nodes type (by Tim Weißenfels).
• Cleaned up code (by Dmitry Kirillov).

8.4.33

• Fixed NoWorkResult behavior difference with normal mode (by Romain Menke).
• Fixed NoWorkResult usage conditions (by @​ahmdammarr).

8.4.32

• Fixed postcss().process() types (by Andrew Ferreira).

8.4.31

• Fixed \r parsing to fix CVE-2023-44270.

8.4.30

• Improved source map performance (by Romain Menke).

8.4.29

• Fixed Node#source.offset (by Ido Rosenthal).
• Fixed docs (by Christian Oliff).

8.4.28

• Fixed Root.source.end for better source map (by Romain Menke).
• Fixed Result.root types when process() has no parser.

8.4.27

• Fixed Container clone methods types.

8.4.26

• Fixed clone methods types.

8.4.25

• Improve stringify performance (by Romain Menke).
• Fixed docs (by @​vikaskaliramna07).

8.4.24

• Fixed Plugin types.

8.4.23

• Fixed warnings in TypeDoc.

8.4.22

• Fixed TypeScript support with node16 (by Remco Haszing).

8.4.21

• Fixed Input#error types (by Aleks Hudochenkov).

... (truncated)

Commits

• edda95e Release 8.4.35 version
• 612f360 Merge pull request #1924 from postcss/refactor/types
• 5e7449f Fix node.parent.nodes type
• 65075df Allow to pass undefined to adding methods to simplify type check
• 477b3bb Release 8.4.34 version
• 25af117 Update dependencies
• bb0314a Merge pull request #1922 from tim-we/improve-at-rule-types
• 9dd5a93 Fix at-rule test
• 8322d11 Fix visitor test
• ee7fcd4 Fix Document#nodes
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Updates react-scripts from 2.1.8 to 5.0.1

Changelog

Sourced from react-scripts's changelog.

3.0.0 and Newer Versions

Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for the newer versions.

Commits

• 19fa58d Publish
• 9802941 fix: webpack noise printed only if error or warning (#12245)
• 2eef1d0 Update templates to use React 18 createRoot (#12220)
• 221e511 Publish
• 5614c87 Add support for Tailwind (#11717)
• 20edab4 fix(webpackDevServer): disable overlay for warnings (#11413)
• 3afbbc0 Update all dependencies (#11624)
• f5467d5 feat(eslint-config-react-app): support ESLint 8.x (#11375)
• c7627ce Update webpack and dev server (#11646)
• 544befe Update package.json (#11597)
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

[pull-request-quantifier-deprecated]

This PR has 2 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

---

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +1 -1
Percentile : 0.8%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.json : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

• Fast and predictable releases to production:
  • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
    iterations.
  • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
• Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
  • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
  • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
• Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
  • Small portions can be assimilated better.
• Better engineering practices are exercised:
  • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
  • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

• Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
  • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
  • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
• Change your engineering behaviors
  • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
    • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
    • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

• One line was added: +1 -0
• One line was deleted: +0 -1
• One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
  interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
• Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
  of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

---

Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud