Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Masked the outputs #124

Open
rafikg opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Masked the outputs #124

rafikg opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@rafikg
Copy link

rafikg commented Sep 19, 2019

Thanks @michalfaber,
I am wondering if still make sense to mask the outputs if we have already masks the input image before. If we remove the outputs mask, we don't still need two build two different graphs for training and testing?

@michalfaber
Copy link
Owner

I experimented a little bit with masking the input image instead of the masking outputs. I didn't see a significant improvement so I left the model unchanged. The original paper says that masking improves the performance by 2.3 % but they were training their model much longer.

@rafikg
Copy link
Author

rafikg commented Sep 21, 2019

@deeperdeeper,
Thanks, I definitely agree!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants