Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some intellisense don't work well in interactive window after writing some REPL commands #7064

Open
linette-zyy opened this issue Jun 30, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@linette-zyy
Copy link

Environment
image

Steps to Reproduce
1.Create a Python Application
2.Open an Interactive Window
3.Write some codes to get intellisense
4.Write '$help' to get REPL commands
image
5.Write '$cls'
6.Repeat step3

Expected behavior
All IntelliSense should work well

Actual behavior
Some intellisense don't work well after using '$cls'、‘$clear’、'$reset'

Additional context and screenshots
REPL_commands

And I would like to mention, when i write the REPL commands firstly ,the intellisense display incorrectly
REPL_commands_display

@StellaHuang95 StellaHuang95 added needs investigation Could be an issue - needs investigation and removed needs triage labels Jun 30, 2022
@judej judej removed the needs investigation Could be an issue - needs investigation label Feb 23, 2023
@linette-zyy
Copy link
Author

In today's build:17.7.0 Preview 2.0 [33709.378.main],Python Package:17.0.23115.2
By the way,'@' is covered when type enter in interactive window
type_enter_covered

@linette-zyy
Copy link
Author

In today's build:17.8.0 Preview 1.0 [33902.16.main], Python Package:17.0.23179.1
The cursor is hang after using '$reset'
$reset_hang

@ttSpace
Copy link

ttSpace commented Oct 21, 2024

I can repro it in today's build 17.13.0 Preview 1.0 [35417.248.main], Python Package: 17.0.24293.1.
Intellisense doesn't work well after using '$cls', ‘$clear’, '$reset'.

Image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants