Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance using the cosine distance #28

Open
LiyaoTang opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Performance using the cosine distance #28

LiyaoTang opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@LiyaoTang
Copy link

LiyaoTang commented Jun 8, 2022

Hi @caoyue10 , thanks for your insightful work.

I found that the experiments and discussion in your paper state that different types of distance (e.g. l2, l1) in calculating the loss perform equally well. However, I would like to further know that if this still holds for the Cosine distance as well?

Since cosine distance has been prevalent in previous CL works, and it involves a l2-normalization, I think experimenting with this could be helpful. Could you shed some light on this?

Best.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant