-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for custom date hierarchy for year-month-week hierarchy #74
Comments
@TrutzS |
I second the remark of @quickaid-fr |
Hello @quickaid-fr, |
Hi @IIonaSimakova, |
I am getting 53rd week on the slicer but I don't have any data for 53rd week. I'm getting this on every year. Any help here please. |
@TrutzS , What should I change now to have 52 weeks on the slicer labels as well? I want to have ISOWeek format instated US week labels. |
@uve My interpretation is that this issue occurs for all years where january 1st is a friday, saturday or sunday, since the week numbering rules are then different. I.e. 3/7 (43%) of all years are displayed incorrectly for us in this slicer. I suggest providing an option for the slicer where we can choose between using US week numbers or ISO week numbers, based on the functionality of WEEKNUM([Date]) and WEEKNUM([Date],21) |
@Manikumar34 the slicer operates currently only with US weeks. So we need to wait for an update to support at least the ISO week format. Apart from that, the slicer always displays all possible time slots between minimum date and maximum date of the date field you supplied to the visual. This is regardless of the fact if there is data in your dataset for a given timeslot or not. |
Thanks for the samples. |
Hi @EugeneElkin & @uve, could you please give us an updated ETA here? I also noticed that the corresponding pull request has been waiting for a review for a while #81 Have a nice day! |
Hi @ora-gh , We’re going to release a new version of TimelineSlicer with ISO weeks support later this month. |
Hi @EugeneElkin & @uve, could you please give us an updated ETA? I understood it would be made available in February, and time flies so here comes March. I would really appreciate an update with a precise estimate for when I can expect to utilize this fix. The Microsoft appsource still has version 2.1.1.0 from 29th of January 2020. |
Hi @EugeneElkin |
Time estimate for this fix would be much appreciated! |
Hi @EugeneElkin & @uve, could you please give us an update here? Intended usage is inside Power BI Service, so I cannot modify this slicer manually. The Microsoft appsource still has version 2.1.1.0 from 29th of January 2020. |
The AppStore is now updated to 2.4.0.0 but I am unable to install it into my reports. Ref: https://appsource.microsoft.com/en-us/product/power-bi-visuals/WA104380786?tab=DetailsAndSupport Presumably this is the same issue as seen previously in other cases like in the link below, where the appstore and Power BI are not in sync "according to PowerBI safe deployment process": https://community.powerbi.com/t5/Desktop/Custom-Visual-not-Updating-Smart-Filter-by-OKViz/td-p/1035261 Note that even deleting 2.1.1 inside the report, then downloading 2.4.0 and importing 2.4.0 into the report becomes 2.1.1 after import. Its a bit strange to see it in the appstore before it fully works, but I am at least very happy to see some progress here. @uve, when will this update be available inside Power BI reports? |
Hi all,
I have created a custom date hierarchy to always allocate full weeks to a month (basically the week goes to the month into which the 4+ days fall, similar to ISOWeek for the start of the year).
Is there an option to adapt the timeline slicer for that?
The current implementation of the timeline slicer doesn't work with custom hierarchies. As an alternative one could use the standard hierarchical slicer, but it works vertical instead of horizontal like the timeline slicer and doesn't provide the same ease of multi-select.
Example: Week 14 is not correctly allocated
Example: Week 53 doesn't exist in 2019
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: