Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow DBF input, not just TXT #15

Open
nvkelso opened this issue Dec 5, 2011 · 6 comments
Open

allow DBF input, not just TXT #15

nvkelso opened this issue Dec 5, 2011 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@nvkelso
Copy link
Collaborator

nvkelso commented Dec 5, 2011

If I have a SHP, it has a DBF. I want be able to point Dymo at that DBF and have it run, without intermediate steps that get out of synch.

@migurski
Copy link
Owner

migurski commented Dec 6, 2011

DBF's do not have spatial information in them, IIRC.

@migurski migurski closed this as completed Dec 6, 2011
@nvkelso
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nvkelso commented Dec 6, 2011

DBFs that have an explicate latitude and longitude column, do. Requiring
the user add those columns in the GIS is easier than requiring the user
maintain a separate CSV of their SHP file grouping.

@migurski
Copy link
Owner

migurski commented Dec 7, 2011

Can you provide an example?

@migurski migurski reopened this Dec 7, 2011
@nvkelso
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nvkelso commented Dec 7, 2011

@migurski
Copy link
Owner

migurski commented Dec 8, 2011

Is this a case where you've chosen to go in and add these columns yourself, or is it something that shapefiles do normally? If there is a discrepancy between the .dbf and the .shp, who wins?

@nvkelso
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nvkelso commented Dec 8, 2011

I've added them, it's not normal for the DBF part of SHPs to have these.

the SHP always wins in terms of long/lat coordinates. But it's relatively
trivial to update these columns in the DBF in ArcMap and QGIS.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants