Promise(never, <Thing>), hmm, why not Always(<Thing>)?
#415
Closed
nilslindemann
started this conversation in
Language Development
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Oh, ok, it has been a while. Thanks for answering. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am still not fluid in these Promise/Maybe/Result things in functional programming, and so my request may be stupid, but could we have a type
Always(Thing)which is an alias forPromise(never, <Thing>)? Looks like a valid shortcut to me.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions