You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm working on adapting NequIP and Allegro for classification tasks. Given that these architectures are primarily designed for energy and force predictions in atomistic simulations, I have a few questions about modifying them for classification:
Would changing the loss function (e.g., to cross-entropy) and providing discrete target labels be sufficient for basic classification, or would it require more complex modifications to the architecture?
For the force-related components, could I simply set the coefficient of the force term to zero if it's not needed for classification, or would this approach cause issues?
Are there any specific considerations or challenges I should be aware of when attempting to use these models for classification instead of regression?
Any guidance or insights from those experienced with these models would be greatly appreciated!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi everyone,
I'm working on adapting NequIP and Allegro for classification tasks. Given that these architectures are primarily designed for energy and force predictions in atomistic simulations, I have a few questions about modifying them for classification:
Any guidance or insights from those experienced with these models would be greatly appreciated!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions