You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm up for this. I'd like the current syntax be be essentially a short form of the new extended one:
Right now: 1d 7d 30d
Has this meaning:
daily for first seven days
weekly until day 30
The equivalent in extended form code possibly then be: 1d:7d 7d:30d. If you don't need the extended one, you can skip the duplicate numbers.
I don't like my syntax suggestion either though; it looks like hex codes.
What bits me is that even with the current syntax, the first and last delta pairs already have the meaning that we want to introduce in the extended version. Meaning: 1h 1d and 1h:1d would be equivalent. I'm not sure what to make of this.
I could also imagine a completely new, verbose syntax:
I aggree with everything you are saying, but sadly I don't have a better idea for the syntax. A verbose syntax has the downside of more complex parsing, but is much better to read.
I propose an addition to the current
deltas
syntax to specify the generations size:deltas: 1h 7d;12h 14d;1d 90d;7d 360d
This would mean:
I realize the syntax is leaving something to be desired.
Please tell me if I overlooked something and this is already possible with the current
deltas
syntax.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: