You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I understand the predicted values before applying op_norm returns probabilities in very low decimal points, sometimes as low as 0.00XXX. The ops_threshs is there to normalise the value between 0 and 1. What is the approach used to attained the selected ops_thresh?
I am currently doing finetuning on the model. Thank you.
p.s. Thank you for releasing such useful work to the world, by the way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The ops_threshs is there to normalise the value between 0 and 1.
No, the ops_thresh is to normalize the values so that 0.5 is the decision boundary. So values above 0.5 can be considered positive and less than 0.5 considered negative. See Section 2.5 Model Calibration here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.00595.pdf
Also check out Section 4 Transfer Learning Example where "model.op_threshs = None" to remove this calibration so it doesn't get in the way of fine tuning.
I understand the predicted values before applying op_norm returns probabilities in very low decimal points, sometimes as low as 0.00XXX. The ops_threshs is there to normalise the value between 0 and 1. What is the approach used to attained the selected ops_thresh?
I am currently doing finetuning on the model. Thank you.
p.s. Thank you for releasing such useful work to the world, by the way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: