Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Makes meds-transform and polars requirements more flexible. #103

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Oufattole
Copy link
Collaborator

@Oufattole Oufattole commented Dec 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated dependency versions for polars, meds, and meds-transforms to allow for broader compatibility with newer versions.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced error handling in the transformation process to manage a wider range of exceptions.

@Oufattole Oufattole requested a review from mmcdermott December 10, 2024 18:00
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made in the pull request focus on updating the dependency version constraints in the pyproject.toml file. The polars package has been modified to allow a range of versions from 1.6.0 to 1.17.1, while the meds and meds-transforms packages have been updated to permit any version greater than or equal to 0.3.3 and 0.0.7, respectively. Additionally, the wrap function in src/MEDS_tabular_automl/mapper.py has been enhanced with broader error handling, replacing a specific exception with a general one to catch any unexpected errors during transformation.

Changes

File Change Summary
pyproject.toml Updated version constraints for polars, meds, and meds-transforms.
src/MEDS_tabular_automl/mapper.py Enhanced error handling in the wrap function, replacing specific exception with a general one.

Poem

In the garden of code, changes bloom bright,
With polars and meds, our future looks right.
From fixed to flexible, we dance with glee,
New versions await, oh what joy there'll be!
Hop along, dear friends, let’s celebrate today,
For updates like these make our worries decay! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Owner

@mmcdermott mmcdermott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/MEDS_tabular_automl/mapper.py (2)

166-168: Consider using a more specific exception type.

While using a generic Exception makes the error handling more flexible, it might mask specific issues that should be handled differently. Consider:

  1. Using a custom exception type (e.g., TransformationError) to catch specific transformation-related errors
  2. Or at minimum, documenting the expected exception types in the docstring

Example implementation:

class TransformationError(Exception):
    """Raised when a transformation function fails."""
    pass

# Then in the docstring:
"""
Raises:
    TransformationError: When a transformation function fails
    ValueError: When input validation fails
"""

Line range hint 1-400: Consider enhancing robustness with context managers.

The lock file and cache management could benefit from using context managers to ensure proper cleanup in all scenarios.

Example implementation:

from contextlib import contextmanager

@contextmanager
def transformation_lock(cache_directory: Path):
    """Context manager for handling transformation locks."""
    st_time, lock_fp = register_lock(cache_directory)
    try:
        yield st_time
    finally:
        if lock_fp.exists():
            lock_fp.unlink()

# Usage in wrap function:
with transformation_lock(cache_directory) as st_time:
    # transformation logic here
    pass
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be929e5 and 01c0a52.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/MEDS_tabular_automl/mapper.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/MEDS_tabular_automl/mapper.py (1)

166-168: Verify the impact of version updates on transformations.

The changes in pyproject.toml allowing more flexible versions of polars and meds-transform could affect the transformation behavior.

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the results and generate a final response.

No impact detected from version updates on transformations

The codebase's usage of polars is limited to standard DataFrame operations that are stable across versions:

  • Basic DataFrame operations: select, filter, with_columns
  • I/O operations: read/write parquet
  • Type conversions and column manipulations
  • No usage of experimental or recently added features

Additionally, there are no direct imports or usage of meds-transform found in the codebase, suggesting the version update won't affect the transformation behavior.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential breaking changes in polars and meds-transform versions

# Check for polars version changes that might affect DataFrame operations
rg -A 3 "import polars|from polars" 

# Check for meds-transform usage that might be affected by version changes
rg -A 3 "from meds_transform|import meds_transform"

# Look for specific polars DataFrame operations that might have changed
ast-grep --pattern 'df.$$$'

Length of output: 8361

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.96%. Comparing base (1443717) to head (01c0a52).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #103   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.96%   81.96%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        1253     1253           
=======================================
  Hits         1027     1027           
  Misses        226      226           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Oufattole Oufattole merged commit 374e2f5 into main Dec 10, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants