Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[mobility-theme] Data category "Bike-Parking Locations" should be under main category "Cycling Network Data" #16

Open
BWitsch opened this issue Jul 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested

Comments

@BWitsch
Copy link

BWitsch commented Jul 26, 2024

No description provided.

@peterlubrich
Copy link

Status Quo:
We have a sub-category "bike parking locations" under: Parking, service and rest area information

The proposal is to shift this to:
Cycle network data

Any thoughts from SGW 4.4?

@peterlubrich peterlubrich transferred this issue from mobilityDCAT-AP/mobilityDCAT-AP Aug 16, 2024
@peterlubrich peterlubrich added the question Further information is requested label Aug 16, 2024
@marioscrock marioscrock changed the title Data categori "Bike-Parking" should be under main category Cycling Data [mobility-theme] Data category "Bike-Parking" should be under main category Cycling Data Aug 26, 2024
@marioscrock marioscrock changed the title [mobility-theme] Data category "Bike-Parking" should be under main category Cycling Data [mobility-theme] Data category "Bike-Parking Locations" should be under main category "Cycling Network Data" Aug 26, 2024
@marioscrock
Copy link
Contributor

We may also mention "Bike-Parking Locations" as sub-category of both Cycle network data and Parking, service and rest area information.

@marioscrock marioscrock added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants