Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[mobility-theme] Cycle Network Data - Data Content Categories - Name convention #20

Open
BWitsch opened this issue Oct 29, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@BWitsch
Copy link

BWitsch commented Oct 29, 2024

Dear all,
while implementing the mobility dcat theme I figured out a smal detail:
In the data content category "Pedestrian network data" all Data categories starts with pedestrian... e.g. "Pedestrian network geometry"
In the data content category "Cycle network data" no Data categories contains cycle in the beginning e.g. "Network geometry and lane character"

Shouldn't they have the same naming convention?
Even to prevent miss understaning for cycle data.

KR Benjamin

@marioscrock
Copy link
Contributor

marioscrock commented Dec 4, 2024

Hi @BWitsch, thank you for opening this issue! I agree with this suggestion, and I believe that also other terms (e.g., related to Road Data) may benefit from a review of the naming conventions. This can be done as part of the next release introducing also the mapping to DR discussed in #8

  • Review with domain experts the naming conventions for the mobility-theme (@peterlubrich)
  • Add deprecation/relatedBy notes for changing IRIs (@marioscrock)

@marioscrock marioscrock self-assigned this Dec 4, 2024
@marioscrock marioscrock changed the title Data Content Category: Cycle Network Data - Data Content Categories - Name convention [mobility-theme] Cycle Network Data - Data Content Categories - Name convention Dec 4, 2024
@marioscrock marioscrock added the question Further information is requested label Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants