You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear all,
while implementing the mobility dcat theme I figured out a smal detail:
In the data content category "Pedestrian network data" all Data categories starts with pedestrian... e.g. "Pedestrian network geometry"
In the data content category "Cycle network data" no Data categories contains cycle in the beginning e.g. "Network geometry and lane character"
Shouldn't they have the same naming convention?
Even to prevent miss understaning for cycle data.
KR Benjamin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @BWitsch, thank you for opening this issue! I agree with this suggestion, and I believe that also other terms (e.g., related to Road Data) may benefit from a review of the naming conventions. This can be done as part of the next release introducing also the mapping to DR discussed in #8
Review with domain experts the naming conventions for the mobility-theme (@peterlubrich)
Add deprecation/relatedBy notes for changing IRIs (@marioscrock)
marioscrock
changed the title
Data Content Category: Cycle Network Data - Data Content Categories - Name convention
[mobility-theme] Cycle Network Data - Data Content Categories - Name convention
Dec 4, 2024
Dear all,
while implementing the mobility dcat theme I figured out a smal detail:
In the data content category "Pedestrian network data" all Data categories starts with pedestrian... e.g. "Pedestrian network geometry"
In the data content category "Cycle network data" no Data categories contains cycle in the beginning e.g. "Network geometry and lane character"
Shouldn't they have the same naming convention?
Even to prevent miss understaning for cycle data.
KR Benjamin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: