You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The normalized string attribute name of the "Terminal" element is the unique instance name of the terminal. The terminal name must be unique on each level.
Does that mean the "name" attribute must be unique w.r.t. to the "Terminals" list only, or does the 2nd sentence extent the uniqueness to the names of "ModelVariables" ?
I think we need a clarification here,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
FMI Design Webmeeting:
Pierre: I think the second sentence above refers to nested terminals
Torsten: For a Modelica Tool it would be strange and one would have to do effort to fix this issue.
Otto: There is also a sentence about the structured naming convention
Pierre: I think this does not forbid to have the same name
Torsten B.: If you have a terminal with name A, which a Terminal member variable "B", the name of the referenced variable does not have to have the name "A.B". We could add this sentence as non normative text.
Pierre, Torsten: Both solulations have problems for either importer or exporter. So we should fix it.
Otto: in Modelica there are connectors where the connector is the variable
Torsten B.: If you want to graphical information for an input that is no terminal, you should create a terminal that contains the variable
Pierre: I would not allow same variable names and terminals on the top level, because it could lead to problems in downstream technologies.
Torsten B.: We should consider if this has implications in FMI-LS-STRUCT
Torsten B.: I will look into this and ask him if he remembers.
In section 2.4.9.2.2 Terminals we wrote:
Does that mean the "name" attribute must be unique w.r.t. to the "Terminals" list only, or does the 2nd sentence extent the uniqueness to the names of "ModelVariables" ?
I think we need a clarification here,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: