You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please refer to cell 4 of the flopy3_get_transmissivities_example notebook. Is there a bug in the case of well 0? I.e., transmissivities should all be 0 for this well, but it is 2 in layer 3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As a follow up on the above message, I checked the source code of the module and I found some unclear steps at the end of the function code. I.e., thick[closest, i] = 1.0 in the last line of the for loop doesn't make sense to me.
not_in_layer = np.sum(thick < 0, axis=0)
not_in_any_layer = not_in_layer == thick.shape[0]
for i, n in enumerate(not_in_any_layer):
if n:
closest = np.argmax(thick[:, i])
thick[closest, i] = 1.0
thick[thick < 0] = 0
thick[heads == nodata] = 0 # exclude nodata cells
Please refer to cell 4 of the
flopy3_get_transmissivities_example
notebook. Is there a bug in the case of well 0? I.e., transmissivities should all be 0 for this well, but it is 2 in layer 3.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: