Replies: 1 comment
-
|
i must've misremembered agreement on this, apologies. what you're saying makes sense, given we wedged this update in without breaking changes, which is a triumph! i'll roll it back to 2.8.0 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
i was surprised to see the 231108 release tagged with v3.0.0
what was the reasoning?
sure we don't want to save that bump for when breaking changes are needed?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions