-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tfinfo and GRN files #191
Comments
Hi @momur , Thank you for trying celloracle. The binding site is shown in the As you pointed out, the gene_short_name is an annotation of the peak_id. For example, peak "chr10_100009210_100010306" is a cis-regulatory element of the gene DNMBP. |
Hi, Thank you for your reply. It helps. My motivation here is to know which motifs are found in the promoter and enhancer regions. We provide co-accessible peaks, and celloracle performs TF motif scanning in the co-accessible sites. TF info is created after the TF motif scanning step. I thought that direct factors are the motifs found in the co-accessible sites. Is there a way to retrieve the information that I am looking for from any celloracle outputs? Thanks! |
You can distinguish promoter peaks and other distal regulatory element peaks as follows. In the peak data preprocessing step, peak annotation was already done. https://morris-lab.github.io/CellOracle.documentation/notebooks/01_ATAC-seq_data_processing/option1_scATAC-seq_data_analysis_with_cicero/02_preprocess_peak_data.html#3.-Integrate-TSS-info-and-cicero-connections In this dataframe, |
Hello dev team,
Thanks for the amazing tool. I would like to understand the TFinfo and Base GRN files a little bit better.
The TF info file looks like this: What are these factors_direct and factors_indirect columns exactly? Are these the motifs found in the distal elements from co-accessibility analysis?
and GRN looks like this. The gene_short_name is the annotation of the peak_id in the TF info file, right?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: