Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Resampling should be more accurate #7

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 20, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Resampling should be more accurate #7

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 20, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels
auto-migrated Priority-Medium Type-Defect

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link 

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Using a box filter should only read every channel value once for. But
there exist some cases where the value if read 0 or 2 times.
This may improve the quality of the scaling slightly.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by m%[email protected] on 23 Aug 2009 at 8:49
@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author 

See testcase 7 for more details.

Original comment by m%[email protected] on 23 Aug 2009 at 8:51

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
auto-migrated Priority-Medium Type-Defect
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@GoogleCodeExporter