You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
All the functions in this library assume y axis is oriented downwards ↓, so the semantics are different
However when I looked at the code for orient3d, it seems completely identical to Shewchuk's original code (no negations etc. as seen in orient2d)... does this mean the Y axis is right-side up again or am I missing something?
(As far as I'm concerned, the closer to replicating the exact semantics of the original code, the better... so I have no concerns about the Y axis being in the correct orientation, as it makes porting code way easier without having to negate everything. Just want to make sure that's the case... and if so the documentation might need a clarification.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The README says:
However when I looked at the code for orient3d, it seems completely identical to Shewchuk's original code (no negations etc. as seen in orient2d)... does this mean the Y axis is right-side up again or am I missing something?
(As far as I'm concerned, the closer to replicating the exact semantics of the original code, the better... so I have no concerns about the Y axis being in the correct orientation, as it makes porting code way easier without having to negate everything. Just want to make sure that's the case... and if so the documentation might need a clarification.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: