Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mistakes in SGA-2020 #56

Closed
djschlegel opened this issue Mar 15, 2022 · 20 comments
Closed

mistakes in SGA-2020 #56

djschlegel opened this issue Mar 15, 2022 · 20 comments

Comments

@djschlegel
Copy link
Collaborator

This ticket can track galaxies in SGA-2020 used for DR9 that should be re-fit with different starting parameters:

https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=55.11&dec=-28.68&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=14&sga

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

@Snell1185
Copy link

Snell1185 commented Apr 22, 2023

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

moustakas commented May 16, 2023

UM461 is split into two; the secondary (SDSS) source is a compact HII region in this low-metallicity galaxy--https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=177.8879&dec=-2.3733&layer=ls-dr10&zoom=16&sga

UGCA20 might be the HII region, but regardless the parent galaxy is missing
https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=25.8187&dec=19.9655&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=14&sga-parent&sga

Missing PGC061664 - merger + star:
https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=274.0390&dec=42.6564&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=14&sga-parent&sga

PGC002634 - missing merger / companion:
https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=11.0808&dec=-17.3580&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=14&sga-parent&sga

PGC1049719 - size impacted by star
https://www.legacysurvey.org//viewer/?ra=149.7777&dec=-5.0718&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=14&sga

PGC2106849 - probably should not have been part of IC4182_GROUP
https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer-desi?ra=196.4636&dec=37.6669&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=13&sga-parent&sga

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

moustakas commented Jun 6, 2023

ESO201-10 appears to be a globular cluster or something else (but not a galaxy)--
https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer/?ra=58.7621&dec=-49.6149&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=14&sga&sga-parent
https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/byname?objname=ESO201-10&hconst=67.8&omegam=0.308&omegav=0.692&wmap=4&corr_z=1

Confirmed to be a GC by Alex Drlica-Wagner:

This one is known as Arp-Madore 1 (AM1) or E1.  It is one of the most distant globular clusters (120 kpc), 
has a pretty large half-light radius (~15pc), and I'm not sure if it has a measured velocity dispersion 
(there isn't one listed in the Harris GC cluster catalog, but imagine someone must have measured it).

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

NGC0547 - crowded cluster field; SGA is totally wrong on one of the giant galaxies
https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer-desi/?ra=21.5026&dec=-1.3447&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=14&sga&sga-parent

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

PGC087438 is a crowded cluster that's not handled correctly--
https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer-desi/?ra=55.1092&dec=-28.6770&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=15&sga&sga-parent

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

moustakas commented Jun 9, 2023

Some additional missing systems based on a comparison with Hecate:

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

moustakas commented Jun 12, 2023

The central coordinates for NGC4395 (https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer-dev/?ra=186.455993&dec=33.546294&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=15&sga&sga-parent), NGC0247 (https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer-dev/?ra=11.783689&dec=-20.758056&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=15&sga&sga-parent#NGC%20247), and NGC4565 (https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer-dev/?ra=189.0864&dec=25.9874&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=14&sga&sga-parent), three large, famous galaxies, are incorrect. Bummer. There are probably more...

Also, the NGC4395 minor axis length is too small.

@Snell1185
Copy link

@Snell1185
Copy link

#56 (comment) reply

Other examples include: NGC0598 NGC3031 NGC4258 NGC4826

These should follow the central artifact is the right position center

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

The residual masking is too aggressive in some spheroidals, leading to a loss of light in the outer envelopes. A couple examples:
https://sga.legacysurvey.org/group/UGC07124?index=2
https://sga.legacysurvey.org/group/IC0941?index=4

@moustakas
Copy link
Owner

I'm closing this ticket in favor of several new, more finely grained tickets:

@Snell1185 thank you for your contributions, which we continue to welcome!

@Snell1185
Copy link

Snell1185 commented Jul 7, 2023

PGC213712 is star

Migrated to 51

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants