Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Epic: Establish Wagtail as a usable workflow on existing mozorg surfaces. #14795

Open
12 of 16 tasks
alexgibson opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
12 of 16 tasks
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@alexgibson
Copy link
Member

alexgibson commented Jul 8, 2024

Description

Bedrock has a new Wagtail powered CMS back-end / database, but it is not yet powering any pages in production. The aim of this epic is to migrate one or more existing surfaces to be editable by the CMS, as well as establish the processes, guardrails, and workflows that need to be implemented in order to support CMS management in a safe, predictable manner.

Key results:

  • Migrate one or more existing mozorg surfaces to Wagtail. Possible candidates include
  • Implement user groups and permissions for editing, previewing, approving and publishing content.
  • Implement content publishing approvals and workflow.
  • Document workflows, processes and software-enforced “guard rails” for:
    • CMS users editing, and publishing content to existing CMS surfaces.
    • Developers creating new CMS editable content pages.
    • Developers updating models / templates for existing CMS editable content.

Epic will be broken down into individual issues below:

@stevejalim
Copy link
Collaborator

Re moving the VPN Resource Center to Wagtail is that it'll be v interesting to see if the existing translation work is recognised as being valid and automatically reused, or if Wagtail will chunk the strings differently from Contentful. The latter would be a surprise, but let's see...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants