You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In pull request #219, I’ve refactored the settings configuration to support both the enforced CSP header and the report-only CSP header. Please note, this is a backwards incompatible change.
To minimize disruptions over multiple releases, I propose making multiple backwards incompatible changes at once. Specifically, I suggest changing the import path from csp to django_csp, aligning with common practices for Django apps.
I’m opening this issue for discussion. Please share any feedback, whether in favor or against.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I looked more closely at popular Django apps and it isn't actually as common as I thought to include the django_ prefix in the module name for import. I think it's just that csp has such few words that it makes it feel like more of a scarce space.
Anyway, I'll close this. If there's ever any import path conflicts in the future we can reconsider.
In pull request #219, I’ve refactored the settings configuration to support both the enforced CSP header and the report-only CSP header. Please note, this is a backwards incompatible change.
To minimize disruptions over multiple releases, I propose making multiple backwards incompatible changes at once. Specifically, I suggest changing the import path from
csp
todjango_csp
, aligning with common practices for Django apps.I’m opening this issue for discussion. Please share any feedback, whether in favor or against.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: