Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

> It would be cool to have interactive_[imshow, pcolormesh, hist,...]. I think these all deserve separate functions as they have different signatures and are different in matplotlib. #60

Closed
SeanAshley5 opened this issue Aug 15, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@SeanAshley5
Copy link

It would be cool to have interactive_[imshow, pcolormesh, hist,...]. I think these all deserve separate functions as they have different signatures and are different in matplotlib.

First list:

  • [ x] hist

  • [ x] scatter

  • [ x] imshow

  • pcolormesh

  • errorbar

  • seaborn distplot

each should get their own interactive_[...]_factory and interactive_[...] function

Pretty much all of the functions in pyplot could be possibly be included, but the above are probably the most useful.

  • Hist
  • Scatter

Originally posted by @SeanAshley5 in #59 (comment)

@ianhi
Copy link
Collaborator

ianhi commented Aug 15, 2020

Hi @SeanAshley5 i'm going to close this to keep the tracking of this contained in the other issue. Thanks!

@ianhi ianhi closed this as completed Aug 15, 2020
@SeanAshley5
Copy link
Author

@ianhi no problem bud

@SeanAshley5
Copy link
Author

It would be cool to have interactive_[imshow, pcolormesh, hist,...]. I think these all deserve separate functions as they have different signatures and are different in matplotlib.

First list:

  • [ x] hist

  • [ x] scatter

  • [ x] imshow

  • pcolormesh

  • errorbar

  • seaborn distplot

each should get their own interactive_[...]_factory and interactive_[...] function

Pretty much all of the functions in pyplot could be possibly be included, but the above are probably the most useful.

  • Hist
  • Scatter

Originally posted by @SeanAshley5 in #59 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants