Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support for tidymodels? #232

Closed
nick-youngblut opened this issue Feb 8, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

support for tidymodels? #232

nick-youngblut opened this issue Feb 8, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@nick-youngblut
Copy link

It appears that tidymodels only supports parallelization via the do* packages. That includes doFuture so I was hoping that clustermq would be supported by future, but it appears that this package is all that exists, and it is just a rough developmental package.

I really prefer using clustermq versus batchtools (thanks for making a great package!), but it looks like I'm going to have to go back to batchtools in order to parallelize tidymodels on a cluster.

Are there any plans to support tidymodels via future or another method?

@mschubert
Copy link
Owner

At some point, there should be both a future backend (via the package that you link), but also support for using workers as a cluster object, which would both enable your use case.

However, I do unfortunately not have an ETA for this.

@mschubert
Copy link
Owner

Solution to this will be a consequence of #119

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants