You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We recently ran into a tricky problem where some primer names were accidentally left off of the SampleSheet. The preprocesslog indicated a big dropoff in the number of reads successfully assigned to sample vs identified to barcode and primer which helped tip us off to this problem, however the Identified_Barcodes listed all of the reads associated with each sample+barcode, even if the barcode wasn't listed under that sample (a significant difference in total reads listed in the preprocesslog and the Identified_Barcodes table also helped with troubleshooting). It would be very cool to have one additional table generated by preprocess which listed:
Sample
PrimersExpected
PrimersIdentified
ReadsByBarcode
ReadsByBarcodeAndPrimer
sample1
96
96
1000000
800000
sample2
48
96
1000000
50000
This would make troubleshooting issues with samplesheet formatting much easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So summarize the barcode table more consicely by sample?
Matt
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:36 PM Sam Hunter ***@***.***> wrote:
We recently ran into a tricky problem where some primer names were
accidentally left off of the SampleSheet. The preprocesslog indicated a big
dropoff in the number of reads successfully assigned to sample vs
identified to barcode and primer which helped tip us off to this problem,
however the Identified_Barcodes listed all of the reads associated with
each sample+barcode, even if the barcode wasn't listed under that sample (a
significant difference in total reads listed in the preprocesslog and the
Identified_Barcodes table also helped with troubleshooting). It would be
very cool to have one additional table generated by preprocess which listed:
Sample PrimersExpected PrimersIdentified ReadsByBarcode
ReadsByBarcodeAndPrimer
sample1 96 96 1000000 800000
sample2 48 96 1000000 50000
This would make troubleshooting issues with samplesheet formatting much
easier.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#25>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAno5uFdwldb4KqDmP9gsHrutP03WJctks5sMqd8gaJpZM4OTgUv>
.
We recently ran into a tricky problem where some primer names were accidentally left off of the SampleSheet. The preprocesslog indicated a big dropoff in the number of reads successfully assigned to sample vs identified to barcode and primer which helped tip us off to this problem, however the Identified_Barcodes listed all of the reads associated with each sample+barcode, even if the barcode wasn't listed under that sample (a significant difference in total reads listed in the preprocesslog and the Identified_Barcodes table also helped with troubleshooting). It would be very cool to have one additional table generated by preprocess which listed:
This would make troubleshooting issues with samplesheet formatting much easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: