You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the case of looking up artifacts, would it make sense to group by version first, and then sort on date?
The current behaviour puts 2.17.3 before 2.18.x as it was released at a later date:
I would suggest sorting as follows:
com.fasterxml.jackson.jr:jackson-jr-objects:2.18.1 29 Oct 2024 at 00:24 (CET)
com.fasterxml.jackson.jr:jackson-jr-objects:2.18.0 27 Sep 2024 at 04:03 (CEST)
com.fasterxml.jackson.jr:jackson-jr-objects:2.18.0-rc1 30 Aug 2024 at 20:22 (CEST)
com.fasterxml.jackson.jr:jackson-jr-objects:2.17.3 01 Nov 2024 at 21:37 (CET)
com.fasterxml.jackson.jr:jackson-jr-objects:2.17.2 05 Jul 2024 at 19:16 (CEST)
com.fasterxml.jackson.jr:jackson-jr-objects:2.17.1 05 May 2024 at 04:09 (CEST)
com.fasterxml.jackson.jr:jackson-jr-objects:2.17.0 12 Mar 2024 at 22:54 (CET)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the case of looking up artifacts, would it make sense to group by version first, and then sort on date?
The current behaviour puts 2.17.3 before 2.18.x as it was released at a later date:
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/27761321/388672109-27f9fafc-e324-4f45-9512-e485292f5531.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.U3yOZwzVV0UMslA_wSbDq-Pafobx9zSzPoJpogLXRz8)
I would suggest sorting as follows:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: