We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
$ scryer-prolog -f ?- [user]. t :- (a(1)*a(2)). a(X):-write(X). a(X):-write(X). end_of_file. ?- t. error(existence_error(procedure,(*)/2),(*)/2). % Expected ?- [user]. t :- (a(1)*->a(2)). a(X):-write(X). a(X):-write(X). end_of_file. ?- % Prompt unexpected, expecting: % Warning: overwriting t/0 or better % Error: Syntax error: Operator expected ?- t. error(existence_error(procedure,(*)/2),(*)/2). % Unexpected ?- halt. $ scryer-prolog -f ?- [user]. t :- (a(1)*->a(2)). a(X):-write(X). a(X):-write(X). end_of_file. ?- % Prompt unexpected, expecting: Syntax error: Operator expected ?- t. error(existence_error(procedure,t/0),t/0). % Unexpected ?-
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, I would expect error(syntax_error(incomplete_reduction),read_term/3:2) error message.
error(syntax_error(incomplete_reduction),read_term/3:2)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Is there a reason why no hint appended? error(syntax_error(incomplete_reduction),read_term/3:2, operator expected
error(syntax_error(incomplete_reduction),read_term/3:2, operator expected
No, there is no reason, I just posted minimal message that I would consider "correct" (modulo line number).
No branches or pull requests
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: