You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2024. It is now read-only.
First of all, I would like to thank you for the great effort you are doing to update the table.
I was looking for the MCC-MNC (222-50) however I didn't find it in your list. But I checked it in https://mcc-mnc-list.com/list and it was there. Weirdly I found that they have around 2.8K entry and your table has 1.6K.
Could you please clarify the reason behind this gap?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On 15/09/2020 22:07, Wanderer wrote:
First of all, I would like to thank you for the great effort you are
doing to update the table.
I was looking for the MCC-MNC (222-50) however I didn't find it in
your list. But I checked it in https://mcc-mnc-list.com/list and it
was there. Weirdly I found that they have around *2.8K* entry and your
table has *1.6K*.
Could you please clarify the reason behind this gap?
Thanks
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#28>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGOEBKA77XB6AF35KFI6KTSF7JQVANCNFSM4RNYYBYA>.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
First of all, I would like to thank you for the great effort you are doing to update the table.
I was looking for the MCC-MNC (222-50) however I didn't find it in your list. But I checked it in https://mcc-mnc-list.com/list and it was there. Weirdly I found that they have around 2.8K entry and your table has 1.6K.
Could you please clarify the reason behind this gap?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: