You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As many species will likely appear soon on ReDU and the coverage of NCBI taxonomy even if very good will not be enough, I would suggest adding the possibility to add taxa through the Bioregistry.
This way, there won't be n issues for n taxonomic databases and each time new fields. If something is missing from the Bioregistry, then the request will be added there so that the whole community benefits from it.
That sounds exciting. Do you know if for the bioregistry, if we can resolve back to NCBI if an accession is available? I first just want to avoid white listing a million NCBI entries, but also one important thing is that we can place any organisms on a tree of life.
Hi!
As many species will likely appear soon on ReDU and the coverage of NCBI taxonomy even if very good will not be enough, I would suggest adding the possibility to add taxa through the Bioregistry.
This way, there won't be n issues for n taxonomic databases and each time new fields. If something is missing from the Bioregistry, then the request will be added there so that the whole community benefits from it.
For more background, see also biopragmatics/bioregistry#398.
Happy to develop if needed, especially on the Wikidata part!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: