Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve taxonomical coverage through the bioregistry prefixes #241

Open
Adafede opened this issue Jun 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Improve taxonomical coverage through the bioregistry prefixes #241

Adafede opened this issue Jun 10, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@Adafede
Copy link

Adafede commented Jun 10, 2022

Hi!

As many species will likely appear soon on ReDU and the coverage of NCBI taxonomy even if very good will not be enough, I would suggest adding the possibility to add taxa through the Bioregistry.

This way, there won't be n issues for n taxonomic databases and each time new fields. If something is missing from the Bioregistry, then the request will be added there so that the whole community benefits from it.

For more background, see also biopragmatics/bioregistry#398.

Happy to develop if needed, especially on the Wikidata part!

@mwang87
Copy link
Owner

mwang87 commented Jun 10, 2022

That sounds exciting. Do you know if for the bioregistry, if we can resolve back to NCBI if an accession is available? I first just want to avoid white listing a million NCBI entries, but also one important thing is that we can place any organisms on a tree of life.

Best,

Ming

@Adafede
Copy link
Author

Adafede commented Jun 10, 2022

Not sure to get your question, any case:

https://bioregistry.io/registry/ncbitaxon

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants