Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

200 characters limit - tells to use opensource repo, but isn't this repo opensource ? #356

Open
CoolCold opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@CoolCold
Copy link

Subject

I'm bit lost - is not THIS repo the OpenSource repo - MIT license? If so, what the point of asking to clone opensource repo which has 200 characters limit?

Copy link

dosubot bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Hey @CoolCold! I'm here to help you with any issues and questions you have. I'm a bot designed to assist with bug fixes, answer questions, and guide you to becoming a contributor. Let's tackle this together!

The 200 characters limit is specifically for the demo version of the OpenVoice application. This limit is in place to ensure efficient operation and manage resource usage during the demo. The message suggests cloning the open-source repository because, by doing so, you can modify the code to remove or adjust this limit for your own use. The repository is indeed open-source, and cloning it allows you to customize and extend its functionalities beyond the demo constraints [1].

To continue talking to Dosu, mention @dosu.


Help Dosu learn! Give it feedback: Great Response | Irrelevant Answer | Incorrect Sources | Too Verbose | Hallucination | Other

@dosubot dosubot bot added the question Further information is requested label Jan 31, 2025
@CoolCold
Copy link
Author

I've cloned the repo but it still contains the limit inside. Is it a must to edit some files? Then message should be changed into something like "clone repo and use this VARIABLE_NAME to override the limit, you can set it like THIS_WAY for docker container" - will be much more clear, that it's not a limitation of opensource/closed source

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant