-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Option clarification. #3
Comments
Howdy, thanks for checking lolcat-cc out..
Also in the options i stands for integer and d stands for double/decimal. Let me know if that answers all your questions or if I missed anything or you have further follow up questions.. Would love to know what you think of it, how it compares to other versions etc.. |
I was just fixing a few things and noticed I had never implemented replacing tabs with spaces, I have fixed this now. |
This is not an issue, but...
I can't find any explanation about the options, as they are different from the one in the original lolcat(rb) and lolcat-c.
In my debian, I did "apt list --installed > pack.txt", so I have a long text file to test
Using "cat pack.txt | lolcat-cc ..." with the various options, I couldn't understand part of them.
I can't understand what the option "-f: format" do. Sometimes it do zig zag pattern others it does sloping pattern.
I'm Assuming "-zz" is a zigzag pattern, is it correct?
The option "-g=[d]" seems to change the slop angle of the color strips, but this option seems to be ignored when used in conjunction with option -zz. Besides, calling "-g=[d]" gradient, seems incorrect, as if not describe exactly what the option really do. However, if we look to this option as the speed at which color change (lets call it gradient indeed), I guess the final result, from the perspective of multiple lines, seems like a change in the sloping.
Printing a long file, even not applying option "-zz" it seems that the +/- (zig zag) pattern is triggered some times.
Other times sloping seems negative other times sloping seems positive, I can't find a way to control this, there is no consistent presentation.
Option "-ps" seems does nothing, at least in linux.
I can't spot any difference in using or not option "-tw=[i]".
I can't spot any difference in using or not option "-w=[i]".
For short, seems there is no consistent pattern presentation, even when not using any option!
I hope I you did understand me.
Sorry my lousy English.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: