-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
feat: allow specifying custom relay in dumbpipe (#60) #80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
alx0x10
wants to merge
15
commits into
n0-computer:main
Choose a base branch
from
alx0x10:feat/add-custom-relay-option
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4812a7c
feat: custom relay implem copied from sendme
alx0x10 e8c797c
feat: remove anyhow dependency
alx0x10 a3c7c37
fix: solve code blocking on disabled relay
alx0x10 36799e5
feat: relay tests added
alx0x10 141472e
feat: formated
alx0x10 b9f45e0
doc: relay section added to the readme
alx0x10 49af0b9
feat: timeout on endpoint check
alx0x10 8f8b51a
feat: renamed back to addr
alx0x10 14fac80
feat: correct incorrect addr variable change
alx0x10 d4ed3d4
feat: correct help text
alx0x10 e02dcd3
feat: harmonized node_addr naming
alx0x10 beb254b
feat: revew timeout endpoint online implem
alx0x10 3509cfd
feat: timeout time changed
alx0x10 400c42c
feat: future in timeout simplified
alx0x10 1b523fe
feat: error rising on endpoint online timeout
alx0x10 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It feels a little weird to put the if-conditional inside the timeout. I would put the if-conditional on the outside.
Also, the 0.93.0 blog post recommends a value of 5 seconds, which is what I've implemented in my PR here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok thank you for the resource!
I've made the modifs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Btw I'm not sure to understand why just
let _ =the Result of the timeout instead of.expect()or something to stop if the endpoint does get online.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe a warning?