Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

It's janky to assume Circom step circuits are written with step_in/step_out #19

Open
nalinbhardwaj opened this issue May 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

It's janky to assume Circom step circuits are written with step_in/step_out #19

nalinbhardwaj opened this issue May 18, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@nalinbhardwaj
Copy link
Owner

nalinbhardwaj commented May 18, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Ideally we should make a new keyword in Circom (or overload the meaning of the "public" keyword in our parsing) to support arbitrary structure for I/O for step circuits (rather than special casing and making assumptions about the circuit structure). This will also clean up some code in this repo around special-casing step_in/step_out in the CircomInput struct.

Related: #11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@nalinbhardwaj