Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Issue] With Terrablender installed, JAMD overworld mining dim does not spawn ores #33

Open
3 tasks done
muggleorwizard opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
3 tasks done

Comments

@muggleorwizard
Copy link

Minecraft Version

1.21

Modloader

neoforge-21.0.167

Mod version

neo-5.0.3+mc1.21

Latest version?

  • Yes

Repeatable?

  • Yes

Link to log files

N/A

Steps to reproduce the issue

Install a neoforge instance with Terrablender 1.21-4.0.0.1 and JAMD neo-5.0.3+mc1.21. Enter the overworld mining dimension, dig down.

Description of the issue you are having

When entering the overworld mining dimension of JAMD with Terrablender installed, there will be no ores generated in the mining dimension. JAMD is functional when Terrablender is not installed. Issue also created on the Terrablender GitHub: Glitchfiend/TerraBlender#174

Information

  • I have provided as much information as possible
@UnRealDinnerbone
Copy link
Member

Can you upload the config/jamd/mining.json So I can see what it looks like
What JAMD does it scan for all ore features on the first load them adds them to that json. And that JSON is what is worldgen is for JAMD

@muggleorwizard
Copy link
Author

mining.json

@UnRealDinnerbone
Copy link
Member

The ore are in the json to spawn, guessing the tag minecraft:stone_ore_replaceables is getting changed

@muggleorwizard
Copy link
Author

muggleorwizard commented Aug 14, 2024

yeah, that's why I think Terrablender may be the issue. I looked at past Terrablender issues and there was a similar example of this problem on 1.18 I believe: Glitchfiend/TerraBlender#94

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants