Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consumer ack floor sequence exceeds current stream sequence [v2.10.20] #6159

Open
funkye opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Consumer ack floor sequence exceeds current stream sequence [v2.10.20] #6159

funkye opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
defect Suspected defect such as a bug or regression

Comments

@funkye
Copy link

funkye commented Nov 21, 2024

Observed behavior

At the moment we are observing a situation that the consumer ack floor sequence is much higher than the stream sequence. As a result, the consumer does not read new messages.

Consumer info:
Problem_consumer_info

Stream info:
Problem_stream_info

Expected behavior

Consumer ack floor sequence does not exceed stream sequence and new messages are read by the consumer.

Server and client version

NATS server version: 2.10.20, not a cluster
.NET client version: 2.2.3

Host environment

OS: Ubuntu 22.04.1

Steps to reproduce

No stable reproduce. Observed on WorkQueue type of retention.

@funkye funkye added the defect Suspected defect such as a bug or regression label Nov 21, 2024
@saurabhojha
Copy link

saurabhojha commented Nov 29, 2024

We are also facing the same issue for a workqueue retention type of stream. So far we have not been able to reproduce this consistently.
Server: 2.10.11

@neilalexander
Copy link
Member

We've got a number of fixes lined up for 2.10.23 which should help significantly with this, would you be willing to try out 2.10.23-RC.7?

@wallyqs wallyqs changed the title Consumer ack floor sequence exceeds current stream sequence Consumer ack floor sequence exceeds current stream sequence [v2.10.20] Nov 29, 2024
@wallyqs
Copy link
Member

wallyqs commented Nov 29, 2024

I think this would also have been solved by https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server/pull/6109/files on the v2.10.23 RC.2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
defect Suspected defect such as a bug or regression
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants