Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider to map dynamic fields to Dyn(U)IntNN instead of Dyn(U)IntNN<> #55

Open
mikir opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Consider to map dynamic fields to Dyn(U)IntNN instead of Dyn(U)IntNN<> #55

mikir opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Milestone
Backlog

Comments

@mikir
Copy link
Collaborator

mikir commented Dec 11, 2024

Currently, the dynamic int fields are mapped to the DynIntNN<> types. It will be more convinient for users if they will be mapped to the DynIntNN types. The same is for unsigned types.

Reported by @reinco.
@mikir mikir added this to the Backlog milestone Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mikir