-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 365
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DOC] Reusable moving forward component #2282
Comments
i'm interested in working on this, could you assign it to me? saw you mentioned this section should be easy to update in one spot, but looks like there are a few variations across different pages. maybe could craft a single standard texts or paragraph for this section and use it as a component? happy to build it out!
|
Hi @goffxnca , we love to see the people contributing to open source! docs is an open project where anyone can create PRs, so feel free to open one if you ever want to contribute |
Hey @goffxnca - happy for you to contribute this! What we had in mind was one component that could be inserted anywhere relevant. As you have seen some next steps may be individual to a specific tutorial, I think these should remain but common info can be added to a component. Initial thoughts of what should be in the component is: |
Awesome @goffxnca ! I assigned you this ticket! TYSM!!! As @PiVortex stated, creating a re-usable component that has clear instructions on how to get support is crucial. One issue we have is that there are MANY ways to get dev support through numerous channels. Currently we have a TG folder share link that has about 16 dev chats in it for separate areas of focus. See here: Devs can find this folder by going to github.com/near and clicking on dev support at the top. Or at the bottom of sections there is a Dev Resources link that takes you here: https://docs.near.org/help and has what looks similar to a mirror of github.com/near (you created this right @bucanero ?) In an ideal world, chain abstraction docs should link to the Chain abstraction telegram chat at the end of the article and so on for each topic that pertains to a specific channel. However, we could just link everyone to our main near devs TG channel or Discord as our two main points of entry and then direct support traffic from there. A third option is to link to the folder of dev chats but that could be overwhelming to have 16 options (I'm also missing a few that I need admin rights to add) So... before you start this @gagdiez @frol @bucanero can you chime in on what you think is best here? I do think we could update the docs.near.org/help page to not just mirror github.com/near but have all the support channels listed (as we started) but include each TG channel and their area of focus with a link to each as well as the giant folder. Perhaps you could start there? I can create a new ticket for that if you like or update this one. Lmk what works best for you! |
Cameron just shared this landing page for TG chats -> https://www.nearbuilders.com/ I've seen this landing page before but it was only build dao related items. Looks like they have more and some might be outdated. IMO I think this could be organized a little better as not to be overwhelming for someone new to try and find where they fit in. Grouping these channels into relevant sections and perhaps listing them in a table would be easier for people. WDYT? |
hey guys, thx for directions! loving the ideas about improving support channels and resources. i gonna start working on a reusable component with the basic discord, telegram and office hours info based on what’s been discussed so far. if the telegram link for the component changes later I can tweak it along. My plans:
pr is on its way soon, thoughts welcome. |
Correct, I created the help article based on the GitHub page
For sure, I'd go ahead and update the Help page ( Thanks again @goffxnca for your contributions! 👍 |
What?
In many docs we have a "moving forward section" that often talks about where people can get support. This section should be easily updated in a single are that can then be propagated across docs.
Why?
To improve maintainability of our docs and increase visibility of our support
Acceptance Criteria
Tasks
Resources
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: