You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just a quick thought I had: What if we set a maximum utilization number (90%?) for each collateral pool and also a max utilization number for one trader/wallet (25% of the pool?)
Ensure liquidity for NDOL holders to sell
Reduce protocol risk to single traders allowing increased/diversified participation amongst traders and will prevent one big trader from draining the pool (especially this early) on a winning trade.
We don't want to deter large traders from utilizing the platform however, we also dont want them hogging the whole pool opening NECC up to a lot of centralized risk based on that trader's open position. We offer instant liquidity with, what is essentially, zero slippage for larger traders which is a HUGE incentive to use the platform (since the collateral is instantly locked and they can cash out at any time). By giving them a percentage limit based on the collateral pool amount, they will be incentivized to onboard additional AUM so that they can trade with larger size.
This can also help limit exploit risk if the oracles/RPC start acting up again. As one bad actor cannot take advantage of the entire pool at once.
Potential downsides: Less protocol fees because less of the pool is being utilize. Trader could trade with multiple wallets to get around single trader maximum utilization limit (not sure if there would be a way to prevent this).
Curious what you guys would think. I could run optimal numbers for the utilization %'s for both the pool and single traders if we think its a good idea, just curious on your guys' thoughts on this first?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Just a quick thought I had: What if we set a maximum utilization number (90%?) for each collateral pool and also a max utilization number for one trader/wallet (25% of the pool?)
We don't want to deter large traders from utilizing the platform however, we also dont want them hogging the whole pool opening NECC up to a lot of centralized risk based on that trader's open position. We offer instant liquidity with, what is essentially, zero slippage for larger traders which is a HUGE incentive to use the platform (since the collateral is instantly locked and they can cash out at any time). By giving them a percentage limit based on the collateral pool amount, they will be incentivized to onboard additional AUM so that they can trade with larger size.
This can also help limit exploit risk if the oracles/RPC start acting up again. As one bad actor cannot take advantage of the entire pool at once.
Potential downsides: Less protocol fees because less of the pool is being utilize. Trader could trade with multiple wallets to get around single trader maximum utilization limit (not sure if there would be a way to prevent this).
Curious what you guys would think. I could run optimal numbers for the utilization %'s for both the pool and single traders if we think its a good idea, just curious on your guys' thoughts on this first?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions