ERROR: Unknown option --bin #18

chusanchen · 2020-12-29T05:40:34Z

Hello, dear author：
I had this problem：
$ solc --bin test1.sol | tail -n1 > test1.code
ERROR: Unknown option --bin

I think my Solc is installed correctly
When I enter this command $ solc -help
Ubuntu will be displayed
Usage:
solc [OPTIONS] [ARGS]

Options:
--out-dir [PATH] Output directory for the compiled contracts (Default is ./contracts)
--optimise If present activate the solc optimiser
-k, --no-color Omit color from output
--debug Show debug information
-h, --help Display help and usage details

chusanchen · 2020-12-29T08:56:59Z

Can i use command $ solcjs --bin test1.sol | tail -n1 > test1.code to replace $ solc --bin test1.sol | tail -n1 > test1.code

nescio007 · 2021-01-04T12:24:01Z

Hi,

solc if installed correctly should have a --bin option (see https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/using-the-compiler.html).

The solcjs command line tool available from npm appears to be incompatible:

The commandline options of solcjs are not compatible with solc and tools (such as geth) expecting the behaviour of solc will not work with solcjs.

(Quote from https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/installing-solidity.html#solcjs)

If all else fails, Solidity does provide statically linked binaries for most versions at https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/releases which should work out-of-the-box.

Please note that for our experiments we used Solidity v0.4.9 (see also #17), and that some of the examples might not work with a newer version of Solidity.

chusanchen · 2021-01-06T15:21:11Z

Hi dear author
Now my solc version is 0.4.9 and solc can --bin
but When I execute $ solc --bin test.sol | tail -n1 > test.code
the error is: test.sol:27:9: Error: Undeclared identifier.
require(owner == msg.sender);
^-----^
and the content of test.sol is :
pragma solidity ^0.4.0;

contract Test{

struct Transaction{
    address to;
    uint amount;
}

mapping (bytes32 => Transaction) transactions;

address owner;

function set_owner(address new_owner){
    owner = new_owner;
}

function new_transaction(address to, uint amount) returns (bytes32){
    bytes32 token = sha3(to, amount);
    Transaction storage t = transactions[token];
    t.to = to;
    t.amount += amount;
    return token;
}

function approve(bytes32 token){
    require(owner == msg.sender);
    Transaction storage t = transactions[token];
    t.to.transfer(t.amount);
    delete transactions[token];
}

}

nescio007 · 2021-01-06T15:28:09Z

Apologies, apparently my notes were incorrect, require was only introduced with v0.4.10 (and the contract compiles well with v0.4.11):

docker run -ti ethereum/solc:0.4.11 --bin -
pragma solidity ^0.4.0;

contract Test{

struct Transaction{
    address to;
    uint amount;
}

mapping (bytes32 => Transaction) transactions;

address owner;

function set_owner(address new_owner){
    owner = new_owner;
}

function new_transaction(address to, uint amount) returns (bytes32){
    bytes32 token = sha3(to, amount);
    Transaction storage t = transactions[token];
    t.to = to;
    t.amount += amount;
    return token;
}

function approve(bytes32 token){
    require(owner == msg.sender);
    Transaction storage t = transactions[token];
    t.to.transfer(t.amount);
    delete transactions[token];
}

}

======= <stdin>:Test =======
Binary: 
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

chusanchen · 2021-01-07T02:00:01Z

Hi dear author
when i execute $ python bin/gen_exploit.py test.contract.code 0x1234 0x1000 +1000
and the result is :
INFO:root:Finished all paths
INFO:root:Finished all paths
INFO:root:Finished all paths
INFO:root:Found 1 CALL instructions
INFO:root:Finished all paths
INFO:root:CALL: ( 769) 301: f1 -7 +1 = -6 CALL
INFO:root:Path: 0->39->44->e2->ea->22a->289->301
INFO:root:No DELEGATECALL instructions
INFO:root:No CALLCODE instructions
INFO:root:No SELFDESTRUCT instructions
INFO:root:Found 3 RETURN and STOP instructions
INFO:root:End: ( 171) ab: f3 -2 +0 = -2 RETURN
INFO:root:Path: 0->51->59->106->1dd->8e->ab
INFO:root:End: ( 225) e1: 00 -0 +0 = 0 STOP
INFO:root:Path: 0->39->ac->b4->1e5->227->e0->e1
INFO:root:Calling contract 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542975 &
1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542975 &
UDiv(STORAGE_3[SHA3_5d_3], 1) (136_3)
INFO:root:End: ( 261) 105: 00 -0 +0 = 0 STOP
INFO:root:Path: 0->39->44->e2->ea->22a->289->30e->35d->104->105
INFO:root:All ends: [<teether.evm.results.SymbolicResult object at 0x7fd24ed197f0>, <teether.evm.results.SymbolicResult object at 0x7fd24ec550a0>, <teether.evm.results.SymbolicResult object at 0x7fd24ec554f0>]
INFO:root:Could not exploit any RETURN+CALL
Did I finish and succeed in this experiment？

nescio007 · 2021-01-10T17:36:06Z

Hi @chusanchen,

unfortunately no, teEther should be able to find an exploit for the example.
I suspect it is an issue with the interface to z3. Could you post the version of z3 you were using? I'll then check whether I can recreate the problem.

chusanchen · 2021-06-07T13:02:25Z

Hi  Do u remember me ? long time no see ;)  how can i see my z3 version ?  My version of Python3 is 3.8.5   ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "nescio007/teether" ***@***.***>; 发送时间: 2021年1月11日(星期一) 凌晨1:36 ***@***.***>; ***@***.******@***.***>; 主题: Re: [nescio007/teether] ERROR: Unknown option --bin (#18) Hi @chusanchen, unfortunately no, teEther should be able to find an exploit for the example. I suspect it is an issue with the interface to z3. Could you post the version of z3 you were using? I'll then check whether I can recreate the problem. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

nescio007 · 2021-06-07T13:08:39Z

Hi,

if you installed z3-solver using pip you can use

pip freeze | grep z3

Otherwise, z3.get_version_string() works from within python:

python -c 'import z3;print(z3.get_version_string())'

chusanchen · 2021-06-07T13:10:20Z

 My version of Python 3 is 3.8.5。  The command 'Python'  doesn't work in my work so i use the Python3 to execute. just like  $ python3  bin/extract_contract_code.py test.code > test.contract.code $ python3 bin/gen_exploit.py test.contract.code 0x1234 0x1000 +1000 Is it because there's something wrong with Python3?

…

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "nescio007/teether" ***@***.***>; 发送时间: 2021年6月7日(星期一) 晚上9:08 ***@***.***>; ***@***.******@***.***>; 主题: Re: [nescio007/teether] ERROR: Unknown option --bin (#18) Hi, if you installed z3-solver using pip you can use pip freeze | grep z3 Otherwise, z3.get_version_string() works from within python: python -c 'import z3;print(z3.get_version_string())' — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

chusanchen · 2021-06-07T13:13:56Z

This is my z3 version 4.8.9

…

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "故事还长" ***@***.***>; 发送时间: 2021年6月7日(星期一) 晚上9:10 ***@***.***>; 主题: 回复： [nescio007/teether] ERROR: Unknown option --bin (#18)  My version of Python 3 is 3.8.5。 The command 'Python'  doesn't work in my work so i use the Python3 to execute. just like $ python3  bin/extract_contract_code.py test.code > test.contract.code $ python3 bin/gen_exploit.py test.contract.code 0x1234 0x1000 +1000 Is it because there's something wrong with Python3?

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "nescio007/teether" ***@***.***>; 发送时间: 2021年6月7日(星期一) 晚上9:08 ***@***.***>; ***@***.******@***.***>; 主题: Re: [nescio007/teether] ERROR: Unknown option --bin (#18) Hi, if you installed z3-solver using pip you can use pip freeze | grep z3 Otherwise, z3.get_version_string() works from within python: python -c 'import z3;print(z3.get_version_string())' — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

nescio007 · 2021-06-07T13:16:09Z

Sorry, it's easy to forget that python3 is not the default for everyone yet :)
Thanks for posting your z3 version, I'll see whether I can recreate your issues.

In the meantime, could you try to downgrade your z3 to version 4.8.5?

pip install z3-solver==4.8.5.0

chusanchen · 2021-06-07T13:20:20Z

OK I will try my best to downgrade my z3 to version 4.8.5 :)  Dear author are you Chinese? Do you use wechat? Maybe we can add wechat to make communication easier. Thank you very much and wish you have a good day :)

…

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "nescio007/teether" ***@***.***>; 发送时间: 2021年6月7日(星期一) 晚上9:16 ***@***.***>; ***@***.******@***.***>; 主题: Re: [nescio007/teether] ERROR: Unknown option --bin (#18) Sorry, it's easy to forget that python3 is not the default for everyone yet :) Thanks for posting your z3 version, I'll see whether I can recreate your issues. In the meantime, could you try to downgrade your z3 to version 4.8.5? pip install z3-solver==4.8.5.0 — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

ERROR: Unknown option --bin #18

ERROR: Unknown option --bin #18

chusanchen commented Dec 29, 2020 •

edited

Loading

chusanchen commented Dec 29, 2020

nescio007 commented Jan 4, 2021

chusanchen commented Jan 6, 2021

nescio007 commented Jan 6, 2021

chusanchen commented Jan 7, 2021

nescio007 commented Jan 10, 2021

chusanchen commented Jun 7, 2021 via email

nescio007 commented Jun 7, 2021

chusanchen commented Jun 7, 2021 via email

chusanchen commented Jun 7, 2021 via email

nescio007 commented Jun 7, 2021

chusanchen commented Jun 7, 2021 via email

ERROR: Unknown option --bin #18

ERROR: Unknown option --bin #18

Comments

chusanchen commented Dec 29, 2020 • edited Loading

chusanchen commented Dec 29, 2020

nescio007 commented Jan 4, 2021

chusanchen commented Jan 6, 2021

nescio007 commented Jan 6, 2021

chusanchen commented Jan 7, 2021

nescio007 commented Jan 10, 2021

chusanchen commented Jun 7, 2021 via email

nescio007 commented Jun 7, 2021

chusanchen commented Jun 7, 2021 via email

chusanchen commented Jun 7, 2021 via email

nescio007 commented Jun 7, 2021

chusanchen commented Jun 7, 2021 via email

chusanchen commented Dec 29, 2020 •

edited

Loading