Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Strategy to synthesize UNIT1 contrast from T1map images #283

Closed
Nilser3 opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Strategy to synthesize UNIT1 contrast from T1map images #283

Nilser3 opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@Nilser3
Copy link

Nilser3 commented Nov 28, 2023

Description

The nih-ms-mp2rage dataset contains UNIT1-denoised data and T1-maps (see #280 (comment) ), however for MS lesion segmentation UNIT1 non-denoised is classically used (and it is the contrast that we have for the other MS MP2RAGE datasets: marseille-3T-mp2rage and basel-mp2rage),
so a strategy is required to be able to synthesize UNIT1 non-denoised images from the T1-maps.

UNI-den

image

T1-map

image

Strategy:

  • The synthesis of UNI images from T1maps was reported in the work of Massire et al., 2021
  • For this synthesis, some MP2RAGE acquisition parameters are required such as : nbefore, nafter, alpha1, alpha2, TR, MP2RAGE-TR, TI1 and TI2. Parameters not available for the nih-ms-mp2rage data,
    but if I take the parameters reported by Demortière et al., 2020
    I obtain the following results:

Synthetic UNI from non-den T1-map

image

I believe that we would have more precise results if we have the MP2RAGE parameters from nih-ms-mp2rage data.

Related issues:

#280

@jcohenadad
Copy link
Member

I'm not a fan of this two-step strategy-- what if the synthesis misses minor lesions? Why not train a model with den-UNI1 and non-denUNI1 first and see what you get?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants