You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would it make things very slow if we kept words that have links? so we have the de-linked text instead of "???" ?
This would be useful for matching a) meta-analyzed papers cited in tables (where the words are sometimes linked to the references, to b) the references.
Often, the relevant column containing the meta-analyzed papers contains a lot of "???". From looking at the original papers, it looks like the ???'s are where there are links to citations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'll have a look! these "???" seem to be inserted by docbook when it
encounters broken cross-references but it may be something else, too
did you find them only in tables or in text as well?
Would it make things very slow if we kept words that have links? so we have the de-linked text instead of "???" ?
This would be useful for matching a) meta-analyzed papers cited in tables (where the words are sometimes linked to the references, to b) the references.
Often, the relevant column containing the meta-analyzed papers contains a lot of "???". From looking at the original papers, it looks like the ???'s are where there are links to citations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: