Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix -resume with fai usage #137

Closed
LouisLeNezet opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #158
Closed

Fix -resume with fai usage #137

LouisLeNezet opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #158
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@LouisLeNezet
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of the bug

Using the fai element in the ch_fasta channel hinder the resume of the pipeline.
When used the cached element aren't used and the pipeline recompute the processes and the succeeding ones.

Possibilities:

  • Find why
  • Remove the fai as it is not directly used (not even sure it really is used in the different processes)

Example: in the test profile the pipeline will not resume the variant calling at the preprocessing of glimpse 1

Command used and terminal output

nextflow run nf-core/phaseimpute -profile singularity,test --outdir results -resume

Relevant files

No response

System information

No response

@LouisLeNezet LouisLeNezet added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 25, 2024
@LouisLeNezet LouisLeNezet added this to the v0.99.0 milestone Oct 28, 2024
@LouisLeNezet
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Linked to nextflow-io/nextflow#5439

@LouisLeNezet LouisLeNezet modified the milestones: v0.99.0, v1.1.0 Oct 28, 2024
@LouisLeNezet LouisLeNezet linked a pull request Nov 24, 2024 that will close this issue
11 tasks
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in Hackathon October 2024 Nov 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant