Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unable to search by proprietary drug name e.g tazocin #18

Open
drcjar opened this issue May 14, 2013 · 9 comments
Open

unable to search by proprietary drug name e.g tazocin #18

drcjar opened this issue May 14, 2013 · 9 comments
Labels

Comments

@drcjar
Copy link
Member

drcjar commented May 14, 2013

should return PIPERACILLIN WITH TAZOBACTAM which is what tazocin is

@davidmiller
Copy link
Member

We currently don't have either a good mapping or an exhaustive list.
Extraction isn't really a good long-term option - the time costs of
scraping are high.

Crowdsource it?

On 14 May 2013 14:27, Carl Reynolds [email protected] wrote:

should return PIPERACILLIN WITH TAZOBACTAM which is what tazocin is


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/18
.

Love regards etc

David Miller
http://www.deadpansincerity.com
07854 880 883

@simonh10
Copy link

I've already done this analysis as part of my attempt to do generic/branded budget comparison. I'll see if I've got it somewhere as a json dump. It was done by finding the lowest equivalent priced product and assigning that to the generic option.

@drcjar
Copy link
Member Author

drcjar commented May 14, 2013

Using other sources e.g www.bnf.org it's quick to look up a drug that we don't match correctly on e.g Tazocin
screenshot from 2013-05-14 14 33 22

I'd be happy to manually add if we need to know when we fail and we don't at present #14 and even if we did we'd miss incorrect matches #19 .....

@davidmiller
Copy link
Member

Could be misremembering, but weren't there concerns raised about the er,
clinical accuracy of that mapping?

On 14 May 2013 14:33, Simon Hargreaves [email protected] wrote:

I've already done this analysis as part of my attempt to do
generic/branded budget comparison. I'll see if I've got it somewhere as a
json dump. It was done by finding the lowest equivalent priced product and
assigning that to the generic option.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/18#issuecomment-17876042
.

Love regards etc

David Miller
http://www.deadpansincerity.com
07854 880 883

@simonh10
Copy link

It's as accurate as the BNF codes are. Everything that follows a pattern of e.g. 0409020C0__ACAC is equivalent in chemical formulation, dosage and delivery form.

@drcjar
Copy link
Member Author

drcjar commented May 14, 2013

seems to handle drugs behind #19 and #13 well

@davidmiller
Copy link
Member

Great.

Now all we need is an original scrape of the BNF data that takes BNF codes
as well.

Could prob write something to imply it from the breadcrumb data.

On 14 May 2013 14:53, Carl Reynolds [email protected] wrote:

seems to handle drugs behind #19https://github.com/nhshackday/mobileformulary/issues/19and
#13 #13 well


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/18#issuecomment-17877229
.

Love regards etc

David Miller
http://www.deadpansincerity.com
07854 880 883

@drcjar
Copy link
Member Author

drcjar commented May 14, 2013

could raise as an issue here https://github.com/tomtaylor/bnf-html if are absent?

@davidmiller
Copy link
Member

Last time I looked the raw codes weren't on the page anywhere - not an
issue with the scrape but the content.

Could raise with the BMJ ? :)

Codes are semantic, which means we can write something to figure it out...
Should have enough in the database currently.

On 14 May 2013 15:38, Carl Reynolds [email protected] wrote:

could raise as an issue here https://github.com/tomtaylor/bnf-html if are
absent?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/18#issuecomment-17880067
.

Love regards etc

David Miller
http://www.deadpansincerity.com
07854 880 883

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants