You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here are example of outputs I got for 19 ensembles of Florence 2018, BEST track with inland hydrology
GAHM + NWM
Interestingly, results for the model set up with GAHM and Holland look fine (see below), but it was not the case for GAHM+NWM and GAHM+NWM+WWM scenarios:
Here are example of outputs I got for 19 ensembles of Florence 2018,
BEST
track with inland hydrologyGAHM + NWM
Interestingly, results for the model set up with GAHM and Holland look fine (see below), but it was not the case for GAHM+NWM and GAHM+NWM+WWM scenarios:
GAHM
Path to four scenarios:
/lustre/hurricanes/florence_2018_BEST_agu_holland/setup/ensemble.dir/analyze/step_linear_k1_p1_n0.025
/lustre/hurricanes/florence_2018_BEST_agu_gahm/setup/ensemble.dir/analyze/step_linear_k1_p1_n0.025
/lustre/hurricanes/florence_2018_BEST_agu_gahm_nwm/setup/ensemble.dir/analyze/step_linear_k1_p1_n0.025
/lustre/hurricanes/florence_2018_BEST_agu_gahm_nwm_wwm/setup/ensemble.dir/analyze/step_linear_k1_p1_n0.025
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: