Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mismatch between model and validation plots generated by plot_selected_validations() #132

Open
FariborzDaneshvar-NOAA opened this issue Jan 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@FariborzDaneshvar-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

FariborzDaneshvar-NOAA commented Jan 12, 2024

Here are example of outputs I got for 19 ensembles of Florence 2018, BEST track with inland hydrology

GAHM + NWM
validation_vortex_4_variable_korobov_2

Interestingly, results for the model set up with GAHM and Holland look fine (see below), but it was not the case for GAHM+NWM and GAHM+NWM+WWM scenarios:

GAHM
validation_vortex_4_variable_korobov_4

Path to four scenarios:

  • Holland: /lustre/hurricanes/florence_2018_BEST_agu_holland/setup/ensemble.dir/analyze/step_linear_k1_p1_n0.025
  • GAHM: /lustre/hurricanes/florence_2018_BEST_agu_gahm/setup/ensemble.dir/analyze/step_linear_k1_p1_n0.025
  • GAHM+NWM: /lustre/hurricanes/florence_2018_BEST_agu_gahm_nwm/setup/ensemble.dir/analyze/step_linear_k1_p1_n0.025
  • GAHM+NWM+WWM: /lustre/hurricanes/florence_2018_BEST_agu_gahm_nwm_wwm/setup/ensemble.dir/analyze/step_linear_k1_p1_n0.025
@FariborzDaneshvar-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator Author

FariborzDaneshvar-NOAA commented Jan 12, 2024

Another example of a similar mismatch with 10 ensemble without inland hydrology!
#104 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant