Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ChainyJS - microjs task runner #26

Open
balupton opened this issue Mar 20, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

ChainyJS - microjs task runner #26

balupton opened this issue Mar 20, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@balupton
Copy link

Taking a bunch of ideas here, I created https://github.com/chainyjs/chainy about a year ago. I then took a big break of programming. While I think it isn't there yet, it certainly has potential. I'm keen to garner more widespread feedback from people in this area.

@balupton
Copy link
Author

... no thoughts at all?

@tunnckoCore
Copy link

yo man, yea it's in my todo list from few days. :)

@tkellen
Copy link
Contributor

tkellen commented Apr 22, 2015

@balupton To be totally honest, I'm burnt out on task runner theory. I'm quite happy to maintain foundational modules that make them easier to write (liftoff, etc) but I don't have the energy or interest in trying to rally the community around a standard these days.

/cc @contra @phated

@yocontra
Copy link

What does it provide that streams don't, other than a better API?

@balupton
Copy link
Author

@contra it doesn't depend on streams, so can work with any data type - arrays, buffers, objects, whatnot. More complicated example is here: http://runnable.com/U6ichlSIeJ8quen5/create-a-geojson-file-for-your-github-communities-for-node-js-and-chainyjs

@yocontra
Copy link

@balupton objectMode streams can also pass any kind of data around, which is what gulpjs uses. for an abstraction over streams that provides a similar API to chainy you can check out http://highlandjs.org/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants