Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Question: QT licensing question #170

Open
iyobo opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Question: QT licensing question #170

iyobo opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@iyobo
Copy link

iyobo commented May 3, 2022 •
edited
Loading

I personally don't like QT licensing headaches and the complexities involved in them.

I would like to create a closed-source, potentially commercial node-gui desktop app and use this to pack the app in a manner such that it can hopefully satisfy QT's LGPL licensing limitations.

Can I simply trust that the result of this packer can be distributed to potential customers without thinking about QT "stuff" and licensing?

Or do I still have to send my users a link and have them install QT by themselves?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@iyobo